Organizations: Human Capital, Coordination and Cooperation

  • Ayesha Ali Doctoral Scholar, University of the Punjab, Lahore - Pakistan
Keywords: Organization; Coordination; Contingency model; Cooperation, System model


The article comprises of illustrations that elaborate relationships seen in context of coordination and cooperation within the present technologically advanced organizations. The significant role of theory is to give in detail the explanation of the said concept. It means that the theory of organization will facilitate in comprehension of what organizations are and the way organizations work in a particular environment and how organizations function in various contexts. This has been established as a consequence of the methodical study of modern organizations. Therefore, it is vast implications for several types of organizations. It also rejuvenates the ideas about the concept of organizations and administrating them. Organization theory essentially caters the organization level of analysis such as planning, design, structure, change, development, politics and culture. With reference to organization phenomenon, the investigation studies the productivity of the organization. The objective of the article is to critically examine the complicated process of cooperation and coordination related to the modern organization. The study focuses on models of organization such as the system model and the contingency model. According to the deliberations of the study, the article also focuses on Mintzburg’s model for understanding the concept.


Bernard, C., 1990. Organization theory: From chester barnard to the present and beyond. Oxford University Press,1990.
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. 2002. Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27: 505-522.
Farzad, A., Nahavandi, N., & Caruana, A. (2008). The effect of internal marketing on organizational commitment in Iranian banks. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1480-1486.
Gittell, J. H., Weinberg, D. B., Bennett, A. L., & Miller, J. A. 2008. Is the doctor in? A relational approach to job design and the coordination of work. Human Resource Management, 47: 729-755.
Grant, A. M. 2007. Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32: 393-417.
Hicks, G.H. and C.R. Gullet, 1975. Organizations: Theory and behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kast, F.E. and J.E. Rosenweig, 1988. Organization and management: A systems and contingency approach. 4th Edn.: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Kleinbaum, A.M., T.E. Stuart, Tushman. and L. Michael, 2008. Communication (and coordination?) In a modern, complex organization. Working Paper, Published , July,31, 2008.
Kusluvan, S., Kusluvan, Z., Ilhan, I., & Buyruk, L. (2010). The human dimension. A review of human resource management issues in the tourism and hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 31(2), 174-214.
Mintzberg, H., 1983. Structure in fives: Designing the executive organization, 1983, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall. pp: 62.
Pfeffer, J., 1982. Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pitman. pp:147-162. Richard, S.W., 2007. Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems, USA.
Robbins, S.P., 1987. Organization theory: Structure, design and applications. 2nd Edn., Prentice Hall , Inc: Englewood Cliffes, Ner Jersy.
Von Bertalanffy, L., 1968. General system theory: Foundations, developments, applications. Revised Edition, 1969 New York.
Winkelen, C. M. An investigation into humancapital management and the ambidextrous organisation. Oxfordshire: Henley Business School.
How to Cite
Ali, A. (2019). Organizations: Human Capital, Coordination and Cooperation. International Journal of Information Management Sciences, 1(1), 41-48. Retrieved from